Do we declares disbelief upon the one who leaves Jinns al-’Amal

Do we declares disbelief upon the one who leaves “Jinns Al-Amal” [type of actions]

Scholars have agreed that the one who leaves Jinns al-’Amal completely is a kaafir [disbeliever]. This consensus was narrated by Al-Ajuri in “Ash-Shari’ah” and by al-Imam Ibn Battah, and the consensus was mention by more than one from amongst Ahlul ‘ilm [people of knowledge]. All of them said: “The one who leaves Jinns al-’Amal [type of actions] is a absolutely a kaafir [disbeliever].”

Note:

And from the clear Kufr is abandoning the category of actions [Jins Al-‘Amal] completely, without tying that to the actions of the heart, because the absolute abandonment of the category of actions [Jins Al-‘Amal] on its own is Kufr Akbar, yet we use the absence of that which is nessecitated as evidence for the inside, without making this a condition for the judgment [Hukm] and this is clear from the Book and the Sunnah as the judgment is upon the actions of the body and not upon what lays in the hearts because this is for the Knower of the Unseen [i.e. Allāh].

And Al-Hāfith Ibn Rajab, may Allāh be merciful to him, mentioned in “Fat’h Al- Bārī”  1/23 from Sufyān Ibn ‘Uyaynah that he said, “The Murji’ah called abandoning the obligatory deeds [Al-Farā’idh] a sin at the level of performing the impermissible [deeds], but they are not equal, because committing the impermissible [deeds] intentionally while not making them permissible [Istih’lāl] is a disobedience, while abandoning the obligatory deeds [Al-Farā’idh] while not being ignorant (of the duty to perform them) and without an excuse, is Kufr.”

And the clarification of that is in the issue of Ādam and Iblīs and the scholars of the Jews who accepted the Prophet’s being sent, upon their tongues, yet they did not act upon his legislations.

VIDEOS: